Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BWM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1157 Appeal from: BWM15 v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 2207
File number: NSD 1397 of 2016
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 29 September 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – whether failure to provide adequate reasons – whether denial of procedural fairness
Cases cited: BWM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 2207 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 69; (2016) 243 FCR 556 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 SZWBH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 88; (2015) 229 FCR 317
Date of hearing: 24 November 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms S Burnett
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Clayton Utz
ORDERS NSD 1397 of 2016
BETWEEN: BWM15 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 29 SEPTEMBER 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The Appellant pay the First Respondent's costs. 3. The Appellant provide any response to the affidavit of Mr Thomas Shaw filed on 16 November 2016 on the amount of costs payable within 14 days. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate