Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Samsung C&T Corporation, in the matter of Samsung C&T Corporation [2017] FCA 1169 File number(s): WAD 146 of 2017
Judge(s): GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 5 October 2017
Catchwords: ARBITRATION – international arbitration – application for leave to issue subpoenas – whether the Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to give leave to issue subpoenas under s 23 of the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) for foreign-seated arbitral proceedings
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 6, 12, 19(2)(a), and 19(3) Federal Justice System Amendment (Efficiency Measures) Act (No 1) 2009 (Cth) sch 1 s 3 International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) ss 2D(c), 2D(d), 3(1), 15(2), 16(1), 16(2), 18, pt III div 3, 22(1), 22A, and 23, sch 2 (UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration) arts 1(2), 1(3)(b)(2), 7 (option 1), 27, and 35 International Arbitration Amendment Act 2010 (Cth) s 16 International Arbitration Amendment Bill 2009 (Cth) Revised Explanatory Memorandum, International Arbitration Amendment Bill (Cth) 2010 Evidence Act 1906 (WA) ss 115–118 Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) O 39 International Arbitration Act (Singapore) (Cap 143A, 2002 Rev Ed) ss 3, 13(2) UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2013 Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, opened for signature on 18 March 1970, 847 UNTS 241 (entered into force on 7 October 1972) arts 1 and 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate