Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Walsh v Umoona Tjutagku Health Service Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 7460) (No 3) [2017] FCA 1203 File number: SAD 80 of 2015
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – two respondents jointly represented in victimisation proceedings – claim against first respondent unsuccessful by virtue of statutory bar – claim against second respondent successful – both respondents otherwise taking unsuccessful points in defence of claims – unsuccessful aspects of defences consuming significant portion of trial – multiple offers by respondents – offers subject to terms prohibiting the making of whistleblowing complaints of alleged misconduct by respondents and other persons not joined in proceedings – offers not impudently refused – costs awarded on an issues basis – applicant compensated in respect of unsuccessful points taken by successful respondent
Legislation: Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth), s 4 Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth), s 469-10 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), s 725 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 25.01, 25.14, 40.08
Cases cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) (2015) 237 FCR 127 Kennedy v Secretary, Department of Industry (No 2) [2015] FCA 884 Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig (No 2) [2015] FCA 782 Specsavers Pty Ltd v The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd (No 4) [2012] FCA 652 Walsh v Umoona Tjutagku Health Service Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 7460) (No 2) [2017] FCA 852
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate