Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cooper, in the matter of Chopsonion Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Chopsonion Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] FCA 1207 File number: SAD 212 of 2016
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 12 October 2017
Catchwords: CONTEMPT – consideration of an application for a charge of contempt against a former company director – where the Court made orders by consent for the delivery up of company books and records – whether the charge of contempt is proven beyond reasonable doubt – where the third defendant was aware of the order and failed to comply with it – where the failure to comply with the order was deliberate – where the third defendant contends, having regard to his ill health, that the plaintiffs have not proved beyond reasonable doubt that his actions were wilful and contumacious. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where the plaintiffs sought an order dispensing with the requirement for personal service in compliance with r 41.07 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the plaintiffs sought an order dispensing with compliance with the requirement that the initial order bear the endorsement as required by r 41.06 of the Rules – where the defendant did not oppose the orders dispensing with the requirement for compliance with rr 41.07 and 41.06 of the Rules.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 41.06, 41.07, 42.13
Cases cited: Ambrose (Trustee), in the matter of Peter Athanasas (Bankrupt) (No 2) [2008] FCA 1016 Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union and Others v Mudginberri Station Proprietary Limited (1986) 161 CLR 98 Hurd v Zomojo Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 148 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate