Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hislop v Paltar Petroleum Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 1213 File number: NSD 1383 of 2017
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 12 September 2017
Date of publication of reasons: 13 October 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for discharge of injunction – where injunction was ordered ex parte – where defendants allege material non-disclosure by plaintiff on application for injunction – whether material non-disclosure – where defendants allege that injunction should be dissolved on materials before the Court – where delay in bringing application for discharge – whether injunction should be dissolved – application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 236, 237
Cases cited: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Allam (2016) 327 ALR 595; [2016] HCA 3 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Carpenter v Pioneer Park Pty Ltd (in liq) (2004) 51 ACSR 245; [2004] NSWSC 973 Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1002 Farrell v Delaney (1952) 52 SR (NSW) 236 Fitz Jersey Pty Ltd v Atlas Construction Group Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 53 Huang v Wang (2016) 114 ACSR 586; [2016] NSWCA 164 The Owners of the S.S. Kalibia v Wilson (1910) 11 CLR 689 Swansson v R A Pratt Properties Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 313; [2002] NSWSC 583 Syndicate Mortgage Solutions Pty Ltd v Khaled El-Sayed [2010] NSWSC 348 Thomas A Edison Limited v Bullock (1912) 15 CLR 679
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate