Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1251 File number: NSD 2066 of 2016
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 25 October 2017
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – consumer guarantee provisions – where representations made about the existence, exclusion or effect of a guarantee, right or remedy – where contraventions admitted – where agreed orders and pecuniary penalty – whether proposed relief appropriate – application allowed
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law ss 18, 29(1)(m), 29(1)(n), 64, 224, 232, 246 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v AGL South Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 399 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Breast Check Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 1068 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Bunavit Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 6 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 327 ALR 540; [2015] FCA 330 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Fisher & Paykel Customer Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1393 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd trading as Bet365 (No 2) [2016] FCA 698 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1413 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 382 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 378 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pepe's Ducks Ltd [2013] FCA 570 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc (1999) 161 ALR 79; [1999] FCA 18 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sampson [2011] FCA 1165 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) (2011) 282 ALR 246; [2011] FCA 761 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Virgin Mobile Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 1548 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Z-Tek Computer Pty Ltd (1997) 78 FCR 197 BMW Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2004) 207 ALR 452; [2004] FCAFC 167 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Limited (1972) 127 CLR 421 ICI Australia Operation Pty Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 Makarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Minister for Industry, Tourism & Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 72 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249; [2012] FCAFC 20
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate