Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1270 Appeal from: Sun v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2952
File number: QUD 922 of 2016
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 27 October 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether primary judge erred in failing to find that the Tribunal failed to take into account relevant considerations – whether Tribunal erred in failing to identify "all of the circumstances" of appellant's relationship under reg 1.15A(2) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – consideration of Tribunal's obligations under s 368 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether an inference can be drawn that the Tribunal did not have regard to certain matters Held: appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: Cameron v Board of Trustees of the State Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (2003) 130 FCR 122; [2003] FCAFC 214 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389; [2003] HCA 26 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 233 FCR 136; [2001] FCA 1802 Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1987) 14 ALD 291 Klychev v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1356 Lafu v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 112 ALD 1; [2009] FCAFC 140 Li v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 102 ALD 354; [2008] FCA 902 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS (2013) 230 FCR 431; [2013] FCAFC 114 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi (2010) 190 FCR 248; [2010] FCAFC 145 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR (2011) 241 CLR 594; [2011] HCA 1 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS (2010) 243 CLR 164; [2010] HCA 48 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323; [2001] HCA 30 NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1; [2004] FCAFC 263 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1; [2014] FCAFC 38 Pokharel v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 34 Reece v Webber (2011) 192 FCR 254; [2011] FCAFC 33 Sun v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2952 SZDXZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 109 Undershaft No 1 v The Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 175 FCR 150; [2009] FCA 41 WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593; [2003] FCAFC 184 Zhang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 30
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate