Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sanda v PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 1272 File number: NSD 1245 of 2016
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 15 November 2017
Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – representative proceeding – application for extension of limitation period in respect of lead applicant's claim – whether pre-conditions to granting an extension satisfied – whether discretion to extend time should be exercised
Legislation: Limitation Act (NT) 1981 ss 12, 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (Cth) ss 8, 80 Ashmore and Cartier Islands Acceptance Act 1933 (Cth) s 6 Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA)
Cases cited: Bleakley v Higgins [2006] NTSC 89 Braedon v Hynes [1986] NTJ 88 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Cubillo v Commonwealth (No 2) [2000] FCA 1084; (2000) 103 FCR 1 Fersch v Power and Water Authority (1990) 101 FLR 78 Lovett v Le Gall (1975) 10 SASR 479 Napolitano v Coyle (1977) 15 SASR 559 Prince Alfred College v ADC [2016] HCA 37; (2016) 258 CLR 134 Sola Optical Australia Pty Ltd v Mills (1987) 163 CLR 628 Trevorrow v State of South Australia (No 5) [2007] SASC 285; (2007) 98 SASR 136 Wright v Donatelli (1995) SASR 307
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate