Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
InterPharma Pty Ltd v Hospira, Inc (No 2) [2017] FCA 1280 File number: VID 885 of 2017
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 1 November 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – held costs of interim injunction application be reserved
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Resort Hotels Management Pty Ltd v Resort Hotels of Australia Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 730
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Cross-Claimants: Mr T Cordiner QC with Ms K Beattie
Solicitor for the Cross-Claimants: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Cross-Respondent: Ms H Rofe QC with Mr C Thompson
Solicitor for the Cross-Respondent: Stephens Lawyers & Consultants
ORDERS VID 885 of 2017
BETWEEN: INTERPHARMA PTY LTD (ACN 099 877 899) Applicant
AND: HOSPIRA, INC Respondent
AND BETWEEN: HOSPIRA, INC (and another named in the Schedule) First Cross-Claimant
AND: INTERPHARMA PTY LTD (ACN 099 877 899) Cross-Respondent
JUDGE: KENNY J DATE OF ORDER: 1 November 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The costs of the application for an interim injunction dated 6 September 2017 be reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate