Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Unique International College (No 7) [2017] FCA 1289 File number: NSD 1277 of 2015
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – declarations – whether declarations should be made prior to hearing on relief – appropriate form of declarations – level of detail required in declarations
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Australian Consumer Law, ss 18(1), 29(1)(m), 54
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Unique International College [2017] FCA 727 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 4) [2016] FCA 382 Australian Competition and Consumer Commissioner v Valve Corporation (No 7) [2016] FCA 1553 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edwards (2005) 56 ACSR 290; [2005] NSWSC 1278 Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2009] HCATrans 20 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53; [2003] HCA 75 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board [2001] HCA 19, (2001) 206 CLR 1 Warramunda Village Inc v Pryde (2001) 105 FCR 437; [2001] FCA 61
Date of hearing: 28 July 2017 Separate issue determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 13 September 2017 (Applicants) 20 September 2017 (Respondent)
Registry: New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate