Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wilson v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1337 File number: NSD 536 of 2017
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 17 November 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – original jurisdiction – Minister's decision not to revoke a mandatory visa cancellation pursuant to s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether non-revocation decision properly considered the best interests of the applicant's child as a primary consideration – whether the reasons for the non-revocation decision properly demonstrated an appropriate weighing of competing considerations – whether the applicant's criminal offending was a 'stand-alone' consideration – no error shown – application dismissed with costs
Legislation: Constitution, Ch III Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 499(1), 501(3A), 501CA, 501CA(4)(b)(ii) United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Opened for signature 20 November 1989. 1577 UNTS 3 (entered into force 2 September 1990), art 3
Cases cited: Falzon v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCATrans 230 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Murad v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 73 Murad v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 876 Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; (2003) 198 ALR 59 Te Puke v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 398; (2015) 230 FCR 499 Wan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 568; (2001) 107 FCR 133
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate