Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cruz Industries Pty Ltd v Sunny Girl Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1343 File number: NSD 370 of 2017
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 17 November 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by respondent for security for costs – whether reason to believe that applicant company will be unable to pay respondent's costs if so ordered – where delay in applying for security for costs
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 19.01
Cases cited: Axent Holdings Pty Ltd v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1102 Concrete Mining Structures Pty Ltd v Cellcrete Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 360 Devenish v Jewel Food Stores Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 35; 94 ALR 664
Date of hearing: 15 November 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr SJ Hallahan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Gestalt Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr N Murray
Solicitor for the Respondent: K&L Gates
ORDERS NSD 370 of 2017
BETWEEN: CRUZ INDUSTRIES PTY LTD (ACN 166 275 188) Applicant
AND: SUNNY GIRL PTY LTD (ACN 075 676 523) Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 17 NOVEMBER 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate