Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1347 Appeal from: Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Anor [2017] FCCA 1934
File number(s): NSD 1255 of 2017
Judge(s): PERRY J
Date of judgment: 16 November 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where Federal Circuit Court dismissed application for judicial review from Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision to refuse to grant appellant a bridging visa - where appellant did not attend interview in compliance with criteria in cl 050.222, Schedule 2, Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act (Cth) 1958 s 37, 359, 359A, 375A, 376, 438 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.02, 2.03, 2.03A, 2.03AA, Schedule 1, Schedule 2
Cases cited: Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 SZRMQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2013) 219 FCR 212; [2013] FCAFC 142
Date of hearing: 16 November 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms S He, Mills Oakley Lawyers.
ORDERS NSD 1255 of 2017
BETWEEN: AMARDEEP SINGH Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION Respondent
JUDGE: PERRY J DATE OF ORDER: 16 november 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to raise grounds 2, 4 and 5 of the notice of appeal is refused. 2. The appeal is dismissed. 3. The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate