Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
RRG Nominees Pty Ltd v Visible Temporary Fencing Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1352 File number: SAD 275 of 2016
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 15 November 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for freezing order – urgent ex parte hearing – freezing order granted for limited time – Respondents to be heard on the continuance of the order.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011(Cth) r 7.32
Cases cited: Curtis v NID Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1072 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad [2010] FCA 1014; (2010) 273 ALR 194 Patterson v BTR Engineering Australia Limited (1989) 18 NSWLR 319
Date of hearing: 15 November 2017
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J White
Solicitor for the Applicants: Andreyev Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents did not appear
ORDERS SAD 275 of 2016
BETWEEN: RRG NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 066 061 903) First Applicant
SCHNIK NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 155 094 456) Second Applicant
FRANK SCHIRRIPA NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 032 835) Third Applicant
AND: VISIBLE TEMPORARY FENCING AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 165 489 743) First Respondent
MILORAD NESTOROVIC Second Respondent
DRAGANA PINNERI (and others named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate