Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pitman v Johnson (Trustee) [2017] FCA 1382 Appeal from: Application for an extension of time: Pitman v Johnson [2017] FCA 945
File number: SAD 245 of 2017
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 14 November 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension of time within which to commence an appeal – Applicants sought to appeal decision of a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia – period of extension short – prejudice to the Respondents – Applicants have not shown a proper case for grant of an extension – application refused
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 130(2) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 9(3)(b) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.39, 36.03, 36.05 Stamp Duties Act 1923 (SA) s 22
Date of hearing: 14 November 2017
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr NL Strawbridge
Solicitor for the Applicants: Cleveland Chambers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Douglas with Mr K Ryder
Solicitor for the Respondent: O'Loughlins Lawyers
Table of Corrections
29 November 2017 In the second sentence of paragraph 27, the word "not" is inserted between the words "do" and "permit".
ORDERS SAD 245 of 2017
BETWEEN: PHILIP JOHN PITMAN First Applicant
DEAN CLIFT Second Applicant
DOROTHEA TOMAZOS Third Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate