Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ellis v Kanyana Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre Inc [2017] FCA 1543 Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal: Ellis v Kanyana Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre Inc [2017] FCCA 2028
File number: WAD 476 of 2017 Judge: KERR J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – whether satisfactory reason given for delay – whether application for leave to appeal has sufficient merits – application dismissed
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth), s 46PO(3) Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth), s 17A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 35.13, 35.14
Cases cited: Décor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Ellis v Kanyana Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre Inc [2017] FCCA 2028 Gallo v Dawson [1990] HCA 30; 93 ALR 479 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 186; (1984) 3 FCR 344 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 150
Date of hearing: 30 November 2017
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate