Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Knight v Visionstream Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1562 Appeal from: Knight v Visionstream Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCCA 980
File number: VID 587 of 2017
Judge: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – where appellant successful on appeal – whether circumstances exist to warrant the making of a costs order in accordance with s 570(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 368, 570
Cases cited: Knight v Visionstream Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1513 Stanley v Service to Youth Council Incorporated (No 3) (2014) 225 FCR 357 United Voice v J Markoff Family Trust T/a Belrose Care [2012] FMCA 406
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 18 December 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: Fair Work
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr R A Millar
Solicitor for the Appellant: McDonald Murholme Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms R Preston
Solicitor for the Respondent: Piper Alderman
ORDERS VID 587 of 2017
BETWEEN: ANNETTE KNIGHT
Appellant
AND: VISIONSTREAM AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
Respondent
JUDGE: O'CALLAGHAN J DATE OF ORDER: 19 December 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondent pay the appellant's costs of the application before the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in MLG2576/2016 and of the appeal in this Court. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate