Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sadie Ville Pty Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) (No 2) [2017] FCA 1574 File number: VID 632 of 2017
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend statement of claim – whether proposed particulars adequate – whether proposed causation pleadings adequate – leave to amend granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 307, 1041E
Cases cited: Sadie Ville Pty Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2017] FCA 1202 Smith v Australian Executor Trustees Limited [2017] NSWSC 1406 Tamaya Resources Ltd (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (a firm) (2016) 332 ALR 199 Whittenbury v Vocation Limited [2017] FCA 1185
Date of hearing: 18 December 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr LWL Armstrong QC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Phi Finney McDonald
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr A Shearer
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clifford Chance
ORDERS VID 632 of 2017
BETWEEN: SADIE VILLE PTY LTD (ACN 134 578 019) (AS TRUSTEE FOR THE SADIE VILLE SUPERANNUATION FUND) Applicant
AND: DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU (A FIRM) (ABN 74 490 121 060) First Respondent
DELOITTE CORPORATE FINANCE PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 833 127) Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate