Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (No 4) [2017] FCA 1575 File number: NSD 724 of 2016
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 20 December 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceedings – application for Court endorsement of proposed § 1782 application under Title 28 of the United States Code – principles of case management – whether Court should exercise discretion to endorse application to be filed in foreign jurisdiction
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 20.23 United States Code (US) Title 28 § 1782
Cases cited: Biljana Capic v Capstone Law APC (unreported, United States District Court, Central District of California, Mumm J, No. MC-17-118-UA, 16 October 2017) Lavecky v Visa Inc [2017] FCA 454 Sabre Corporation Pty Limited v Russ Kalvin's Hair Care Company [1993] FCA 557; (1993) 46 FCR 428
Date of hearing: 14 December 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G Sirtes SC with Mr R White and Ms A Avery-Williams
Solicitor for the Applicant: Bannister Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Scerri QC with Ms K Anderson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens
ORDERS NSD 724 of 2016
BETWEEN: BILJANA CAPIC Applicant
AND: FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 20 DECEMBER 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate