Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Buadromo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1592 File number: NSD 1392 of 2017
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review of Assistant Minister's decision not to revoke visa cancellation decision – where Applicant made submissions to the Assistant Minister – where Assistant Minister did not make express findings with respect to certain considerations – whether consideration properly given to submissions made – whether failure to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration – consideration of approach to be taken in reviewing reasons for decision of an administrative decision maker – consideration of need not to trespass into merits review PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where Applicant referred to pro bono legal assistance – whether discretion should be exercised such that costs are paid directly to pro bono lawyers
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501CA, 501G(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 4.12, 4.19
Cases cited: 4nature Inc v Centennial Springvale Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 121, (2016) 218 LGERA 289 Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184, (2003) 236 FCR 593 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83, (2015) 231 FCR 513 Belmorgan Property Development Pty Ltd v GPT Re Ltd [2007] NSWCA 171, (2007) 153 LGERA 450 Berryman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 616, (2015) 235 FCR 429 Chancliff Holdings Pty Ltd v Bell [1999] FCA 1783 Commissioner of Taxation v Pham [2013] FCA 579, (2013) 134 ALD 534 Dunn v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 489 East Melbourne Group Inc v Minister for Planning [2008] VSCA 217, (2008) 23 VR 605 Fraser v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1333 Hindi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 20 FCR 1 Islam v Cash [2015] FCA 815, (2015) 148 ALD 132 Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (unreported, FCA, Gummow J, 11 December 1987) King v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 766 Malek Fahd Islamic School Ltd v Minister for Education and Training (No 2) [2017] FCA 1377 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Nguyen [2017] FCAFC 149 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48, (2010) 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32, (2004) 78 ALJR 992 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274, (2001) 106 FCR 426 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21, (1999) 197 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30, (2001) 206 CLR 323 MZZMG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 134, (2015) 234 FCR 180 Reece v Webber [2011] FCAFC 33, (2011) 192 FCR 254 Roesner v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 132 Salahuddin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 141, (2013) 229 FCR 290 Sevdalis v Director of Professional Services Review [2017] FCAFC 9 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146, (2012) 207 FCR 277 Stevens v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1280, (2016) 153 ALD 346 Swift v SAS Trustee Corporation [2010] NSWCA 182, (2010) 6 ASTLR 339 Tewao v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1515
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate