Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Clubs Australia - Industrial v United Voice [2017] FCA 1598 File number: QUD 355 of 2017
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for discovery under r 20.11 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – objection by respondents to certain categories of documents sought – where applicants alleged respondents contravened ss 343 and 348 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) in conducting protests – where applicants sought discovery with respect to two other incidents not alleged to have contravened the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether other incidents relevant to any issue raised by the pleadings – whether discovery sought was oppressive Held: application granted
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Date of hearing: 14 December 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J Bourke QC
Solicitor for the Applicants: Macpherson Kelly
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms C Howell
Solicitor for the Respondents: Hall Payne Lawyers
ORDERS QUD 355 of 2017
BETWEEN: CLUBS AUSTRALIA - INDUSTRIAL First Applicant
WYNNUM MANLY LEAGUES CLUB LIMITED Second Applicant
REDLANDS SPORTING CLUB INC Third Applicant
AND: UNITED VOICE First Respondent
SHARRON CADDIE Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J DATE OF ORDER: 21 December 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate