Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 4) [2017] FCA 1599 File number: QUD 944 of 2016
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – applications for costs of interlocutory applications by applicant and respondent – where interlocutory applications related to examination proceedings under Part 5.9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where interlocutory applications resulted in approximately equal success – whether costs of interlocutory applications should be apportioned – discretion to award costs under s 43 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN Inc (2004) 51 ACSR 555; [2004] FCA 1251 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 2) [2017] FCA 758) Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 3) [2017] FCA 1074 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229; [2001] FCA 1865 Wu v Li [2015] FCAFC 109 at [56] per Foster, Davies and Rangiah JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate