Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deep Investments Pty Ltd v Casey (No 1) [2017] FCA 1643 File number: NSD 2189 of 2016
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 12 May 2017
Date of publication of reasons: 2 August 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notices to produce – whether notices in formal compliance with r 30.28 of Federal Court Rules 2011 – whether to require production of documents where legal professional privilege asserted – whether privilege waived
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 30.28
Cases cited: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 707 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc & Anor [2003] FCA 384; (2003) 127 FCR 499 Ferella & Another v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2010] FCA 766; (2010) 188 FCR 68 Macquarie Bank Limited v Arup Pty Limited [2016] FCAFC 117 Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66; (1999) 201 CLR 1 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589
Date of hearing: 11 May 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate