Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mastec Australia Pty Ltd v Trident Plastics (SA) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] FCA 99 File number: SAD 237 of 2016
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicants seek injunctions at the conclusion of Stage One of the trial in relation to misuse of confidential information – principles relating to springboard injunctions – whether appropriate to grant injunctions. COSTS – Applicants seek costs from the Respondents at the conclusion of Stage One of the trial – application refused.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Ansell Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allied Rubber Industries Pty Ltd [1967] VR 37 Aquaculture Corporation v New Zealand Green Mussel Co Ltd (1985) 5 IPR 353 Baulderstone Hornibrook Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Ltd [2003] FCA 325 Beta Nominees Pty Ltd v Viscount Plastic Products Pty Ltd [1979] VR 167 IPC Global Pty Ltd v Pavetest Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 260; (2017) 124 IPR 101 Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis (1987) 13 FSR 172 Streetworx Pty Ltd v Artcraft Urban Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 140; (2015) 110 IPR 544 Terrapin Ltd v Builders' Supply Co (Hayes) Ltd [1967] RPC 375 Zomojo Pty Ltd v Hurd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1458; (2012) 299 ALR 621
Date of hearing: 8 February 2018
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate