Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ho v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 133 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Ho v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 1750
File number: NSD 1328 of 2017
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – dismissal of application for leave to appeal for non-appearance
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 35.33
Cases cited: Ho v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 1750
Date of hearing: 16 February 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms N Johnson of Mills Oakley
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting appearance, save as to costs
ORDERS NSD 1328 of 2017
BETWEEN: KA YING HO Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: BROMBERG J DATE OF ORDER: 16 FEBRUARY 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's application for leave to appeal dated 4 August 2017 is dismissed. 2. The first respondent's costs of the application be paid by the applicant. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate