Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Plankton Australia Pty Limited v Rainstorm Dust Control Pty Limited [2018] FCA 174 File number: NSD 2072 of 2017
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 27 February 2018
Catchwords: CONTRACTS – general principles as to formation of contract – whether legally binding contract formed – whether conduct manifested mutual assent to be legally bound to essential elements of a contract – whether essential terms agreed where necessary party not yet incorporated – no contract found CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – whether conduct represented the existence of an enforceable agreement - nature of alleged representation as to future conduct – distinctions between promise, prediction, plan and present opinion or intention as to future event – no misleading or deceptive conduct ESTOPPEL – whether representation of the existence of an enforceable agreement – relevance of proportionality when considering grant of relief giving effect to representation – no estoppel found COSTS – whether lump-sum order should be made – relevance of estimates given by parties before outcome known – relevance of urgency and duration of proceedings – lump sum order made
Cases cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570 Anaconda Nickel Ltd v Tarmoola Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 22 WAR 101 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 7) [2017] FCA 1469 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v GR Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 622 Booker Industries Pty Ltd v Wilson Parking (Qld) Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 600 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95 Fewin Pty Ltd v Burke (No 3) [2017] FCA 693 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 486 Glaxosmithkline Australia Pty Ltd v Pharmacor Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1202 Glueck v Stang [2008] FCA 148 Gold & Copper Resources Pty Ltd v Newcrest Operations Ltd [2013] NSWSC 281 Interpharma Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2008] FCA 1283 Laidlaw v Hillier Hewitt Elsey Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 44 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571 Paciocco v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146 Rafferty v Madgwicks (2012) 203 FCR 1 Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505 Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 Terrex Resources NL v Magnet Petroleum Pty Ltd (1998) 1 WAR 144 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165 Uranium Equities Ltd v Fewster (2008) 36 WAR 97 Village Building Co Ltd v Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd (2004) 139 FCR 330 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 Date of hearing: 19-21 February 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate