Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Global Constructions Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) v AIG Australia Limited (No 3) [2018] FCA 432 File number: NSD 2017 of 2017
Judge: ALLSOP CJ
Date of judgment: 28 March 2018
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 37N
Catchwords: INSURANCE – answering of separate questions – approach to resolution of remaining quantification issues
Cases cited: Global Constructions Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) v AIG Australia Limited [2018] FCA 98 Global Constructions Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) v AIG Australia Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 100
Date of hearing: 28 March 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance Insurance List
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr TD Castle
Solicitor for the Applicant: LMI Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms J Thornton
Solicitor for the Respondent: Gilchrist Connell
ORDERS NSD 2017 of 2017
BETWEEN: GLOBAL CONSTRUCTIONS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (IN LIQ) (ACN 135 598 757) Applicant
AND: AIG AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 93 004 727 753) Respondent
JUDGE: ALLSOP CJ DATE OF ORDER: 28 MARCH 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The separate questions the subject of order 1 in the orders of 18 December 2017, be answered as follows: Question 1: A claim under cover 1 of Section 4 of the Private Edge policy issued by the respondent to the applicant ("the policy") is, in the case where the person who engaged in the acts of fraud and dishonesty is both an Employee and a Shareholder (within the meaning of the policy), subject to the set-off for which cover 6 of Section 4 provides. Question 2: For the purpose of Section 4 of the policy, the set-off of the amount stated in cover 6, paragraphs (i) and (ii), is to be made against the Direct Financial Loss (within the meaning of the policy) prior to the application of any Limit of liability under the policy. 2. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the hearing of the separate questions, in the sum of $25,000. 3. Leave be granted to the respondent to issue a subpoena to 4C Consulting Pty Limited of Unit 5, 145 Walcott Street, Mount Lawley, Western Australia in the form initialled and dated today 4. Leave be granted to the respondent to issue a subpoena to Insight Business Partners Pty Limited, trading as ROCG Perth of Level 1, 109 Hay Street, Perth, Western Australia in the form initialled and dated today. 5. Such subpoenas be returnable before a Registrar in Perth on 18 April 2018, with any issues regarding the subpoenas to first be raised with the Registrar in Perth. 6. Leave be granted to file the affidavit of Peter O'Brien sworn 28 March 2018. 7. On or before 13 April 2018, the senior claims manager of the respondent responsible for this claim file and serve an affidavit setting out: (a) whether or not there is an amount presently payable under the policy in the light of the construction of the policy and the communications between the parties; (b) if it is said that there is not, the reason or reasons for that position; (c) if it is said that there is, whether the money had been paid; and (d) if it has not been paid, why it has not been paid. 8. The matter be transferred to Justice Banks-Smith. 9. The matter stood over to a date to be fixed in the week commencing 30 April 2018 or such other date as arranged with the chambers of Justice Banks-Smith for further case management. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate