Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Executor Trustee Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd [2018] FCA 439 File number: NSD 808 of 2012
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2018
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for approval of receivers' remuneration under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 425 – whether charges claimed reasonable and proportionate to quality and complexity of work, time spent, and value and nature of property – where receivers retained consultant for several years and on-charged services to company at rate significantly higher than retainer – whether receivers acted reasonably in failing to consider using powers under s 420(2)(o) to cause company to retain consultant directly at much lower cost to estate – whether quantum of approved remuneration should be discounted – whether allowance should be given to receivers for providing some services to consultant
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 425
Cases cited: Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (2012) 203 FCR 461 Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1253 Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liq) [2016] FCA 337 Blairgowrie Trading Pty Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (In Liq) (2017) 343 ALR 476 In the matter of Banksia Securities Ltd (in liq) (receivers and managers appointed) [2017] NSWSC 540 Sanderson as Liquidator of Sakr Nominees Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Sakr (2017) 93 NSWLR 459 Templeton v Australian Securities Investments Commission (2015) 108 ACSR 545 Warner, Re GTL Tradeup Pty Limited (in liq) (2015) 104 ACSR 633
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate