Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Burgess [2018] FCA 447 File number: SAD 36 of 2018
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – urgent application before a hearing to restrain a person from making a decision to cancel a visa under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) — whether serious question to be tried as to whether anticipated decision would be affected by apprehended bias — evidence insufficient to demonstrate serious question to be tried sufficient to justify the order sought
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 189, 501 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 7.01
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Burgess v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 69 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107, (2017) 347 ALR 173 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332
Date of hearing: 12 February 2018
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Mr Ower SC
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Tern Visa and Migration Lawyers
ORDERS SAD 36 of 2018
PAUL BURGESS Prospective Applicant
JUDGE: CHARLESWORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 12 FEBRUARY 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate