Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Generate Group Pty Ltd v Sea-Tech Automation Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 482 File number: NSD 1701 of 2015
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2018
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs of interlocutory application – whether costs should be awarded as a lump sum – whether costs should be made payable forthwith
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(3)(d) Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 1.35, 40.04, 40.13
Cases cited: Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd v Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 37
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 6 December 2017 (Applicant) 7 December 2017 (First Respondent)
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr T Brennan
Solicitor for the Applicant: SBA Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr C Botsman
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Wilson & Co Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1701 of 2015
BETWEEN: GENERATE GROUP PTY LIMITED (ACN 972 667 228) Applicant
AND: SEA-TECH AUTOMATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 916 434) First Respondent
GREGORY JOHN HARRIS Second Respondent
JUDGE: GLEESON J DATE OF ORDER: 12 April 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The first respondent pay the applicant's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate