Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Williams v IS Industry Fund Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 529 File number: QUD 200 of 2017
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 20 April 2018
Catchwords: SUPERANNUATION – appeal against the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal – whether there was an 'interdependent' relationship – whether there was jurisdictional error – no such error – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth) ss 37(6), 46 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) ss 10, 10A Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.04AAAA(1)
Cases cited: Board of Trustees of the State Public Sector Superannuation Scheme v Edington (2011) 119 ALD 472 Edwards v Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation [2017] FCAFC 173 Lykogiannis v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 361 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Williams v IS Industry Fund Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 524
Date of hearing: 28 June 2017
Date of last submissions: 28 June 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Kingham
Solicitor for the Applicant: Maurice Blackburn
Counsel for the Respondents: The respondents did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate