Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singtel Optus Pty Limited v Optum Inc [2018] FCA 575 Appeal from: Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Optum, Inc [2016] ATMO 11
File number(s): NSD 286 of 2016
Judge(s): DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2018
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – Appeal from a decision of a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks rejecting the Appellant's grounds of opposition to the Respondent's application for registration of trade marks pursuant to s 56 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth). TRADE MARKS – Grounds of opposition to registration: s 58 of the Trade Marks Act, trade mark ownership; s 44 of the Trade Marks Act, prior registrations; s 60 Trade Marks Act, trade mark holder's reputation. TRADE MARKS – Section 58 of the Trade Marks Act: whether the OPTUM word mark and OPTUS word mark substantially identical; whether services provided of the same kind; whether prior use of the OPTUS word mark sufficient to establish common law ownership. TRADE MARKS – Section 44 of the Trade Marks Act: whether the OPTUM word mark and OPTUS word mark substantially identical; whether the OPTUM word mark and OPTUS word mark deceptively similar; whether services provided similar or closely related; whether there are "other circumstances" because of which it would be proper to permit registration of either the OPTUM word mark or the OPTUM logo mark. TRADE MARKS – Section 60 Trade Marks Act: the extent of the applicant's reputation in relation to OPTUS; whether because of that reputation, the use of either the OPTUM word mark or the OPTUM logo mark likely to deceive or cause confusion. TRADE MARKS – Cross-claim for an order under s 101(2), asserting non-use of the OPTUS mark respect of goods and services; whether the Court should exercise its discretion not to order the removal of the applicant's trade marks in respect of any of those goods or services.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate