Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bechara v Bates (No 2) [2018] FCA 583 Appeal from: Bates v Bechara (No 2) [2017] FCCA 985
File number: NSD 981 of 2017
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 30 April 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for a lump sum costs orders – relevant principles discussed – where circumstances warrant lump sum costs order –quantification of lump sum costs order
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Hislop v Paltar Petroleum Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1632 Nine Films and Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Ltd [2006] FCA 1046 Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146
Date of hearing: 15 March 2018
Date of last submissions: 17 April 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Kumar
Solicitor for the Applicant: Weighbridge Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P W Bates
Solicitor for the Respondent: Bannister Law
ORDERS NSD 981 of 2017
BETWEEN: MARIA BECHARA Applicant
AND: PHILIP BATES Respondent
JUDGE: PERRY J DATE OF ORDER: 30 APRIL 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $6000.00. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate