Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ferdinands v State of South Australia [2018] FCA 589 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Ferdinands v The State of South Australia (No 2)[2017] FCA 1436
File number: SAD 335 of 2017
Judge: KERR J
Date of judgment: 27 April 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for leave to appeal – first instance decision not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration – no substantial injustice in refusing leave to appeal – substantive appeal has no prospects of success – application dismissed
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 5.23, 26.01
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1992] FCA 665; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Soiland Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2010] FCA 168 Ferdinands v The State of South Australia [2016] FCA 1268 Ferdinands v The State of South Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 1436
Date of hearing: 27 April 2018
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 54
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms S Mitchell
Solicitor for the Respondent: Crown Solicitor's Office
ORDERS SAD 335 of 2017
BETWEEN: TREVOR KINGSLEY FERDINANDS Applicant
AND: STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Respondent
JUDGE: KERR J DATE OF ORDER: 27 APRIL 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate