Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CFB18 v Reader Lawyers & Mediators [2018] FCA 611 File number: WAD 42 of 2017
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 7 May 2018
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY - application to set aside bankruptcy notice - whether the applicant has a counter-claim , set-off or cross demand pursuant to s 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - where applicant's alleged off-setting claim arises from respondent's representation in Family Court proceedings - no offsetting claim BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY - Application to extend time to review Registrar's decision - whether there was a deemed extension pursuant to s 41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - judgment and orders -judgment containing an account of matters that occurred in Family Court proceedings - whether non-publication order should be made having regard to s 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) - non-publication order made
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 40(1)(g), 41, 41(3), 41(6A), 41(7), 44(1)(c) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 121 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A(5), 37AE, 37AG(1) Civil Judgments Enforcement Act 2004 (WA) ss 7, 15
Cases cited: Abigroup Ltd v Abignano [1992] FCA 567; (1992) 39 FCR 74 Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 16; (2016) 259 CLR 1 Chen v Migration Agents Registration Authority (No 1) [2016] FCA 649 Coshott v Prentice (No 2) [2016] FCA 1531 Ebert v Union Trustee Company of Australia Ltd (1960) 104 CLR 346 Ebert v Union Trustee Company of Australia Ltd (1961) 105 CLR 327 Elkateb v Lawindi [2000] FCA 1939 Guss v Johnstone [2000] HCA 26 Hinchcliffe v Commissioner of Police of the Australian Federal Police [2001] FCA 1747; (2001) 118 FCR 308 Lindholdt v Merritt Madden Printing Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 260 Martin v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2001] FCA 87 Mazukov v University of Tasmania [2004] FCAFC 159 Murdaca v Accounts Control Management Services Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 964 Oreb v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] FCA 321 Palaniappan v Westpac Banking Corporation [2017] FCAFC 121 Re Edelsten; Ex parte Donnelly (1988) 18 FCR 434 Re Glew; Glew v Harrowell [2003] FCA 373 Re Schekeloff; Ex Parte Schekeloff v The Hopkins Group Pty Ltd (1989) 22 FCR 407 Re Shaddock; Ex parte Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1998] FCA 355 Shephard v Chiquita Brands South Pacific Ltd [2004] FCAFC 76 State Bank of New South Wales v Gomez [2002] FCA 1476 Streimer v Tamas (1981) 54 FLR 253 Vogwell v Vogwell (1939) 11 ABC 83 Webb v Hunter [1995] FCA 1443; (1995) 59 FCR 24 Wiltshire-Smith v Mellor Olsson (1995) 57 FCR 572
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate