Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CEZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 631 Appeal from: CEZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2017] FCCA 2824
File number: NSD 2058 of 2017
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether the primary judgment and a related judgment explaining why the applicant's request for an adjournment was refused were attended by sufficient doubt to warrant leave to appeal – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused – Held: application dismissed, with costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1A)
Cases cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc [1981] HCA 39; 148 CLR 170 CEZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2017] FCCA 2824 In re the Will of F B Gilbert (dec) (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Minister for Home Affairs v SZRWS [2018] FCAFC 51 MZAFZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1081; 243 FCR 1 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 183; 244 FCR 305
Date of hearing: 10 May 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate