Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Isley v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 632 File number: VID 1193 of 2017
Judge: KERR J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Minister not to revoke a visa cancellation decision – visa cancelled pursuant to s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Minister failed to have regard to the applicant's claims – whether the Minister was required to consider the effect of a non-revocation decision on applicant's eligibility for parole – whether applicant required to serve full sentence of imprisonment as a result of non-revocation decision – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 198, 501, 501CA, 501G
Cases cited: BHA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1288 Buadromo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1592 ISJ v The Queen [2012] VSCA 321; 38 VR 23 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; 206 CLR 323 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 38; 220 FCR 1 Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 Poroa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 826; 252 FCR 505 Sabharwal v Minister of Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 10
Date of hearing: 30 April and 1 May 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate