Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority v TMeffect Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 678 Appeal from: TMeffect Pty Limited v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (Administrative Appeals Tribunal, No. 2016/3643, 22 June 2017)
File number: NSD 1206 of 2017
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 17 May 2018
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Treasury Laws Amendment (Banking Measures No. 1) Act 2018 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 1.34, 4.01
Date of hearing: 11 December 2017
Date of last submissions: 10 May 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms R C A Higgins SC and Mr B K Lim
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Bennett
Solicitor for the Respondent: Harriss Jones Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1206 of 2017
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant
AND: TMEFFECT PTY LTD Respondent
JUDGE: PERRY J DATE OF ORDER: 17 MAY 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 22 June 2017 is set aside. 2. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the proceeding in the Federal Court of Australia in an amount as agreed or, failing agreement, as taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate