Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reurich v Sureway Employment and Training Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 680 File number: NSD 2015 of 2017
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 17 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time – where no reasonable explanation for substantial delay in making application – where there is a risk of prejudice to respondents – where evidence unclear as to whether applicant had an arguable case – whether extension of time should be granted – application refused.
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PO(1), 46PO(2), 46PO(3)
Cases cited: Eliezer v University of Sydney (2015) 239 FCR 381 Tang v AHG Services (NSW) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1532 Vergara v Living and Leisure Australia Ltd [2013] FCA 775
Date of hearing: 18 April 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 51
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First, Second, Fifth and Sixth Respondents: Ms A Sharp
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate