Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reurich v Campbell Page Ltd [2018] FCA 683 File number: NSD 2128 of 2017
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 17 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time – where no reasonable explanation for delay in making application – where delay caused prejudice to first and third respondents – where applicant does not have an arguable case – whether extension of time should be granted – application refused.
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PO(1), 46PO(2), 46PO(3) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 24
Cases cited: Ferrus v QANTAS Airways Limited (2006) 155 IR 88; [2006] FCA 812 Vergara v Living and Leisure Australia Ltd [2013] FCA 775
Date of hearing: 16 April 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 39
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First and Third Respondents: Mr B Cross
Solicitor for the First and Third Respondents: Kennedys
ORDERS NSD 2128 of 2017
BETWEEN: PETER GEORGE REURICH Applicant
AND: CAMPBELL PAGE LTD First Respondent
CASEY UNKNOWN Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate