Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mir v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 697 Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal: Mir v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 1348
File number: NSD 1115 of 2017
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 8 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal interlocutory judgment of Federal Circuit Court – whether extension of time and leave to appeal should be granted – whether decision of primary judge attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by appellate court – whether sufficient explanation for delay – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for adjournment of hearing – whether sufficient basis for adjournment – whether evidence supported request for adjournment – where adjournment application opposed – adjournment refused MIGRATION – judicial review – application for Skilled (subclass 485) visa – failure to satisfy mandatory criterion for grant of visa – failure to meet cl 485.213 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – failure to apply for Australian Federal Police check within 12 months of date of visa application
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 31, 46 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), r 44.12 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 35.13 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), regs 22.03, 2.07, cl 1229 of Sch 1, cll 485.213, 487.216, 855.213 of Sch 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate