Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sealed Air Australia Pty Limited v Aus-Lid Enterprises Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 716 File number: NSD 6 of 2015
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 21 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment against first respondent and dismissal of a cross-claim under r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – first respondent in default – whether relief ought to be granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Arthur v Vaupotic Investments Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 433 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (ACN 075 400 529) [2006] FCA 1427; (2006) 236 ALR 665 Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd (ACN 102 907 184) v Bose [2006] FCA 94 Geneva Laboratories Limited v Prestige Premium Deals Pty Ltd (No 4) [2016] FCA 867; (2016) 120 IPR 133 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Seagle [2005] FCA 1239; (2005) 146 FCR 400 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Seagle [2008] FCA 1417; (2008) 79 IPR 72 Speedo Holdings B.V. v Evans (No 2) [2011] FCA 1227
Date of hearing: 18 May 2018
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate