Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Granite Transformations Pty Ltd v Apex Distributions Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 725 File number(s): VID 911 of 2017
Judge(s): O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 22 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by first and third respondents to strike out further amended statement of claim – whether pleading sufficient to appraise first and third respondents of case against them – whether each element of each cause of action pleaded – section of further amended statement of claim struck out with leave to re-plead
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 79 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 16.21
Cases cited: Allstate Life Insurance Co v ANZ (1995) 58 FCR 26 Barclay Mowlem Construction Ltd v Dampier Port Authority (2006) 33 WAR 82 Classic Gourmet Sausages Pty Ltd v Leda Commercial Properties Pty Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 313 Giorgianni v R (1985) 156 CLR 473 LED Technologies Pty Ltd v Roadvision Pty Ltd (2012) 199 FCR 204 Lumley v Gye (1853) 2 El & Bl 216; (1853) 118 ER 749 Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2012) 203 FCR 325 Sherrin Hire Pty Ltd v Sherrin Rentals Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1107 Short v City Bank (1912) 12 SR (NSW) 186 Short v City Bank of Sydney (1912) 15 CLR 148 Thomson v STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2012] FCAFC 15 Young Investments Group Pty Ltd v Mann (2012) 293 ALR 537; [2012] FCAFC 107 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 Bullen & Leake & Jacob's Precedents of Pleadings, (16th ed, Sweet & Maxwell Limited, 2008)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate