Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZLZS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 748 Appeal from: SZLZS v Minister for Immigration [2017] FCCA 2578
File number: NSD 1980 of 2017
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 24 May 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where the appellant had previously been refused a protection visa – where his subsequent protection visa application was deemed invalid under s 48A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where he claimed that s 48A did not apply to him because the Form 866 he used to make the first protection visa application was in a different form to that originally prescribed by the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – where this claim has been rejected in multiple decisions of this Court Held: application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: AJB15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 57 APU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 56 AUM17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 306 BLR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 67 BVJ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1205 CDI15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 58 CNP16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 65 SZLZS v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2008] FMCA 1092 SZLZS v Minister for Immigration [2017] FCCA 2578 SZLZS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1690 SZLZS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] HCASL 126 SZMOV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 66
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate