Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Optus Internet Pty Limited [2018] FCA 777 File number: VID 1366 of 2017
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 22 May 2018
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – false or misleading representations – where the respondent represented that it had the right to cancel the customer's telephone and/or internet service on a particular date or within a specified period of time, when it did not have this right – where the respondent represented that customers would need to acquire National Broadband Network based services from the respondent in order to receive home telephone and/or internet services, when this was not the case – where the respondent admitted liability for contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law – where the parties prepared a statement of agreed facts and admissions and jointly proposed declarations and orders including pecuniary penalties totalling $1.5 million – whether proper basis to make the declarations and orders – whether proposed penalties appropriate in the circumstances – proposed declarations and orders made
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 29, 224, 232, 233, 246 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 80
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v AGL South Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 146 ALD 385; [2015] FCA 399 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1997) 145 ALR 36 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] ATPR 42-557; [2017] FCAFC 159 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 327 ALR 540 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2014] ATPR 42-469; [2014] FCA 336 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Aust) Pty Ltd (2016) 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sontax Australia (1988) Pty Ltd [2011] ATPR 42-379; [2011] FCA 1202 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Willesee Healthcare Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 301 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Limited [2016] FCA 44 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill (2010) 269 ALR 1 Foster v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2006) 149 FCR 135 ICI Australia Operations Pty Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249 Trade Practices Commission v Allied Mills Industries Pty Ltd (No 5) (1981) 60 FLR 38; 37 ALR 256 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited [1991] ATPR 41-076; [1990] FCA 762
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate