Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kitay, in the matter of Frigger [2018] FCA 817 File number: WAD 616 of 2017
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 29 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - petition for sequestration orders on the basis of failure to comply with a bankruptcy notice which referred to an unpaid costs order - whether orders should be made dispensing with requirement of deponents to attend for cross-examination - whether the court should determine as a preliminary issue whether there is a reason to go behind the costs order - orders made for hearing of preliminary issues and dispensation with compliance with Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) as to attendance of deponents for cross-examination confined to hearing of preliminary issues
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 29.09
Cases cited: Bolton v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCA 1462 Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Ltd v Compton [2017] HCA 28 Wolff v Donovan (1991) 29 FCR 480
Date of hearing: 29 May 2018
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate