Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Unlockd Limited v Google Asia Pacific Pte Limited [2018] FCA 826 File number: VID 628 of 2018
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interim injunction pending the hearing and determination of an application for an interlocutory injunction – where the first respondent did not oppose the making of interim orders – where the second respondent had not been served and therefore the application proceeded on an ex parte basis against the second respondent – whether to grant interim relief against the second respondent PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – service out of jurisdiction – alleged contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law and the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – whether requirements for service out of the jurisdiction satisfied
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 46, Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 21 Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 10.42, 10.43, 10.44
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Apple Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 416 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v April International Marketing Services Australia Pty Ltd (No 6) (2010) 270 ALR 504 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yellow Page Marketing BV [2010] FCA 1218 Jasmin Solar Pty Ltd v Trina Solar Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 331 ALR 108
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate