Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hooke v Bux Global Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 836 File number: WAD 644 of 2017
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 5 June 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - discovery - whether orders should be made for disclosure - concise statement - direct relevance determined by reference to concise statement and affidavit in support of application - order made for discovery of categories of documents PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - subpoena - leave to inspect documents - whether leave should be refused on the basis that documents not relevant - orders made for inspection
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 461
Cases cited: Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Western Power Corporation [1998] WASCA 127; (1998) 19 WAR 350 Australian Securities and Investment Commission v CME Capital Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 544 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ABC Fund Managers Ltd (No 2) [2001] VSC 383 Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 60; (2001) 105 FCR 136 Boase v Axis International Management Pty Ltd [No 3] [2012] WASC 498 Hooke v Bux Global Limited [2018] FCA 740 Stanley v Layne Christensen Company [2004] WASCA 50 Wong v Sklavos [2014] FCAFC 120
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 17 May 2018 (Plaintiffs) 25 May 2018 (Defendant)
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate