Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CNH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 866 Appeal from: CNH16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 2845
File number: NSD 1939 of 2017
Judge: STEWARD J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2018
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 473DE
Date of hearing: 16 May 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr G Johnson
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mills Oakley
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS NSD 1939 of 2017
BETWEEN: CNH16 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY Second Respondent
JUDGE: STEWARD J DATE OF ORDER: 8 JUNE 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
STEWARD J:
INTRODUCTION 1 The appellant is an ethnic Tamil from Sri Lanka who arrived in Australia in September 2012 and subsequently applied for a Safe Haven Enterprise visa on 9 October 2015. On 12 July 2016, a delegate of the first respondent (the "Minister") refused to grant that visa. The matter was then referred to the second respondent (the "IAA"), which then affirmed the Minister's decision. An application for judicial review was made to the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. That application was dismissed on 20 October 2017. From that decision, the appellant now appeals to this Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate