Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Geowash Pty Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) (No 2) [2018] FCA 879 File number: WAD 230 of 2017
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 11 June 2018
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 118, 119
Cases cited: Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66; (1999) 201 CLR 1 Sugden v Sugden [2007] NSWCA 312
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent appeared in person
Counsel for the Subpoenaed Party: Mr AM Prime
Solicitors for the Subpoenaed Party: MDS Legal
ORDERS WAD 230 of 2017
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION Applicant
AND: GEOWASH PTY LTD (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (ACN 153 078 776) First Respondent
SANAM ALI Second Respondent
CHARLES CAMERON (and others named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
MDS LEGAL Subpoenaed Party
JUDGE: COLVIN J DATE OF ORDER: 11 JUNE 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. There be leave to the parties to inspect the documents produced by MDS Legal in response to the subpoena issued in these proceedings. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate